Re: blcr 0.8.2 with ubuntu karmic (kernel 2.6.31)

From: Neal Becker (ndbecker2_at_gmail.com)
Date: Fri Nov 06 2009 - 17:39:25 PST

  • Next message: Paul H. Hargrove: "Re: blcr 0.8.2 with ubuntu karmic (kernel 2.6.31)"
    On Friday 06 November 2009, Paul H. Hargrove wrote:
    > Alan Woodland wrote:
    > > 2009/11/2 Alan Woodland <alan.woodland_at_gmail_dot_com>:
    > >> The attached patch fixes the cause of the missing modules when
    > >> building on 2.6.31. It doesn't however appear to be the only problem
    > >> when building for 2.6.31, it's now hitting a #error which I haven't
    > >> looked at yet.
    > >>
    > >> For those that are interested 2.6.31 no longer sets $(TOPDIR) in
    > >> kbuild invocations, so trying to work out if we're using kbuild based
    > >> on that fails. I switched to $(obj), I couldn't think of anything
    > >> better to use, but I'm sure there is a more appropriate variable to
    > >> use instead.
    > >>
    > >> When I've had more of a look I might post another patch here to fix
    > >> the remaining problems.
    > >
    > > Two problems seem to exist with 2.6.31:
    > > - find_task_by_pid_type_ns no longer exists, or isn't visible at all.
    > > - find_task_by_pid_ns test passes, with a warning, but dmesg reports
    > > find_task_by_pid_ns not found at modprobe time. I think this might be
    > > a mistake in the kernel headers, but it's still in System.map, so we
    > > can work around this maybe.
    > >
    > > This is the commit log:
    > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit
    > >;h=17f98dcf6010a1cfd25d179fd0ce77d3dc2685c3
    > >
    > > I'm slightly out of my depth here now, I tried to hack a work around,
    > > but didn't succeed yet.
    > >
    > > Alan
    > 
    > W/o trying for myself I can't speculate too deeply on
    > find_task_by_pid_type_ns(), but the git commit log above seems to
    > indicate that some functionality has been removed from the kernel.  I
    > don't yet know how it relates to what BLCR is actually doing w/
    > find_task_by_pid_type_ns().
    > 
    > The commit log also says
    > "remove the exports for find_task_by_pid_ns...."  So, I suggest that the
    > following addition to BLCR's configure.in may be the right fix for that
    > one (since Alan reports that the symbol is still in System.map):
    > 
    > --- configure.ac        23 Aug 2009 22:58:26 -0000      1.410.2.10
    > +++ configure.ac        7 Nov 2009 00:15:14 -0000
    > @@ -1225,6 +1225,7 @@ CR_CHECK_KERNEL_CALL([find_task_by_pid_n
    >  if test -z "${HAVE_FIND_TASK_BY_PID}${HAVE_FIND_TASK_BY_PID_NS}"; then
    >    CR_BAD_KERNEL([unable to determine how to map pid_nr -> struct task])
    >  fi
    > +CR_FIND_KSYM([find_task_by_pid_ns],[CODE])
    > 
    >  CR_CHECK_KERNEL_CALL([find_task_by_pid_type],[#include <linux/sched.h>])
    >  CR_CHECK_KERNEL_CALL([find_task_by_pid_type_ns],[#include
    >  <linux/sched.h>])
    > 
    > 
    > However, it is also possible that BCLR needs to finally move move to the
    > vpid interfaces.
    > 
    > -Paul
    > 
    
    Thanks, but this patch didn't help.
    
    checking kernel for nameidata.path... no
    checking kernel for nameidata.dentry... no
    ======================================================================
    Please review the following configuration information:
      Kernel source directory = /usr/src/kernels/2.6.31.5-122.fc12.ppc
      Kernel build directory = /usr/src/kernels/2.6.31.5-122.fc12.ppc
      Kernel symbol table = /usr/src/kernels/2.6.31.5-122.fc12.ppc/System.map
      Kernel version probed from kernel build = 2.6.31.5-122.fc12.ppc
      Kernel running currently = 2.6.30.9-90.fc11.ppc64
    ======================================================================
    configure: error: Unable to use kernel 2.6.31.5-122.fc12.ppc - unable to 
    determine composition of struct nameidata
    
    Build log here:
    http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/5496-
    blcr-kmod-0.8.1-3.fc12.12/ppc/build.log
    
    I don't have any local system configured with this kernel, so it's not easy for 
    me to debug.
    

  • Next message: Paul H. Hargrove: "Re: blcr 0.8.2 with ubuntu karmic (kernel 2.6.31)"