Re: Fw: BLCR checkpoint sizes

jcduell_at_lbl_dot_gov
Date: Fri Jul 23 2004 - 14:05:08 PDT

  • Next message: jcduell_at_lbl_dot_gov: "Re: Fw: BLCR checkpoint sizes"
    On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 04:11:59PM -0400, Grigory Bronevetsky wrote:
    > Yes, the checkpoints are restarting. I just couldn't piece together why 
    > they were restarting given that the application seems to malloc more state 
    > than the size of the checkpoint. I don't know this application very well 
    > so it may be that it just never touches some of its data pages. Would such 
    > malloc-ed but untouched pages be saved by BLCR?
    
    It may depend on your malloc implementation, but if the pages have never
    been used before (i.e. weren't handed back from a free() call), chances
    are the VM system has them all pointing to a common zero page until
    they're written on, and we aren't saving them.
    
    -- 
    Jason Duell             Future Technologies Group
    <jcduell_at_lbl_dot_gov>       Computational Research Division
    Tel: +1-510-495-2354    Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
    

  • Next message: jcduell_at_lbl_dot_gov: "Re: Fw: BLCR checkpoint sizes"